tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2971081717687612908.post6474084276447712681..comments2024-03-28T11:48:17.788-07:00Comments on Publishing Archaeology: Rejected by Science, yet again!Michael E. Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03942595266312225661noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2971081717687612908.post-91848638348274188492013-04-25T08:26:21.658-07:002013-04-25T08:26:21.658-07:00Speaking of this, I just had an article on raised ...Speaking of this, I just had an article on raised field farming rejected by Nature literally (and I mean literally) two hours after I submitted it. The form rejection email suggested I try my hand at another one of the ton of journals owned by Nature Publishing. I am not saying that it should have been published, but I wonder if editors are trying to get more authors to submit to Nature's other journals. Oh well, maybe I'll shoot for Science and see if it lasts three hours...Christopher Moreharthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08137662548789935245noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2971081717687612908.post-58940077809738860992013-01-08T12:20:40.417-07:002013-01-08T12:20:40.417-07:00Perhaps a relevant book. Recently published on the...Perhaps a relevant book. Recently published on the economics of scientific publishing and funding:<br /><br />How Economics Shapes Science by Paula Stephan (2012)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com